Opt out of the EU Cookie Compliance Law now that the UK has left the EU

Now that the UK has left the EU I would like the government to opt out of the EU cookie compliance law so that UK users do not have to “accept” or “reject” the use of cookies for every website they visit.

Since the UK voted to leave the EU the UK should not be bound to the ridiculous EU cookie compliance legislation. Virtually every public website prompts users to either accept or reject cookies when first visiting. This state of this decision itself usually uses some form of cookie. However with the option of private sessions in most modern web browser this decision is often not saved and users will be alerted to this notice every time they visit the site. This is time consuming and a nuisance.

Sign the petition

Background

Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive 2002/58/EC on Privacy and Electronic Communications, otherwise known as ePrivacy Directive (ePD), is an EU directive on data protection and privacy in the digital age. It presents a continuation of earlier efforts, most directly the Data Protection Directive. It deals with the regulation of a number of important issues such as confidentiality of information, treatment of traffic data, spam and cookies. This Directive has been amended by Directive 2009/136, which introduces several changes, especially in what concerns cookies, that are now subject to prior consent.

EU cookie consent banners are pop-ups or notifications on websites asking whether users will accept browser cookies. The ePrivacy Directive requires websites to get explicit consent from users before storing cookies on their devices. Despite their intended privacy benefits, cookie consent banners are widely regarded as a nuisance. Users are constantly bombarded with these banners on almost every website they visit, disrupting their browsing experience. Europeans collectively lose approximately 575 million hours each year clicking through cookie consent banners mandated by EU law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPrivacy_Directive

Global Reach

The law currently applies to anyone accessing a website from within the EU. European authorities have issued large fines to major US-based tech companies, such as Google and Meta, for ePrivacy violations. It applies to all US websites that:

• Offer goods or services: A US-based e-commerce site selling products to customers in an EU country must comply with the directive.
• Targeted advertising and tracking: If a website uses cookies or similar technologies to monitor the online behaviour of EU visitors, it falls under the directive’s scope.
• Collecting personal data: When a user’s personal data is collected via cookies, sign-up forms, or other tracking methods, compliance is required.

US websites (using cookies) with EU based visitors  must:

• Get prior consent: Obtain clear, explicit consent from users before activating non-essential cookies on their devices.
• Provide clear information: Inform users about the purpose of any cookies used. This is often done via a cookie banner and a detailed cookie policy.
• Enable easy refusal: Offer users a simple way to refuse cookies that is as easy as accepting them.
• Offer website access: Allow users to access the website’s services even if they opt out of certain cookies.
• Handle direct marketing: Obtain prior consent before sending electronic marketing communications to EU users, with some exceptions for existing customers.

Fines can be severe, reaching up to €20 million or 4% of a company’s total annual worldwide turnover, whichever is greater.Approximately 40% of all websites globally use cookies, according to data from W3Techs in September 2025.

24 official EU languages, over 7000 worldwide choose one

Often when visiting a site that conforms to EU cookie compliance banner you are presented with a series of buttons before you can do anything, However, if a user browses the site and does not understand the language, how are they to know what  button to press.

From a legal standpoint under the GDPR, if a user clicks a button they do not understand, their consent is legally void.

The law states that consent must be informed. If a website targets users in a specific country but fails to translate its cookie banner into that country's language, it is committing a compliance violation. If the user clicks the bright button just to clear the screen, the website is technically tracking them illegally.

The Legal Illusion of "Informed Consent"

The core philosophy of European privacy law (GDPR) is that tracking users is illegal unless they give explicit, informed consent  However, the reality of global web traffic breaks this completely:

• The Compliance Paradox: A European regulator might force a website to display a strict consent banner. But if a user from Japan, Brazil, or Greece visits that website, they are presented with a wall of legally dense text in a language they might not speak.
• Blind Clicking: Because the user cannot proceed until the barrier is cleared, the law inadvertently forces them to click something. By clicking the bright button just to read the article, the user is legally "agreeing" to have their data tracked and sold, despite having absolutely no idea they just did so.

The Weaponisation of UI Design (Dark Patterns)

Because websites know users just want the banner gone, companies intentionally exploit the language barrier using deceptive design practices:

• The Trap: If a user can't read the words, they follow the colour. Websites deliberately make the "Accept and Track Me" button big, bright, and obvious, while burying the "Reject" button behind links or in faded text.
• The Result: The language barrier actually makes these "dark patterns" more effective. A user who cannot read the language becomes entirely dependent on visual manipulation, playing right into the hands of advertisers.

"Consent Fatigue" and the Illusion of Choice

Even when a banner is in a user's native language, the sheer volume of them has broken human psychology online.

• The Notification Wall: Studies show that when humans are repeatedly interrupted by the same type of warning over and over again, the brain experiences "warning fatigue."
• Automatic Dismissal: The goal changes from “Let me protect my privacy” to “Get this out of my face as fast as possible.” Adding a language barrier on top of this fatigue turns web browsing into a video game where users just mash the most prominent button to continue.

Sign the Petition

Please help me get this petition started by giving your support and sign today.